Essas filmagens SEMPRE são borradas.

Philipe, não sei por onde mais te contactar, então vai por aqui mesmo.
Há um tempo eu vi uma matéria sobre cristais d’água “reagirem” à sentimentos em palavras humanas. Já chegou a ver?

http://somostodosum.ig.com.br/conteudo/c.asp?id=01919

Este site não é a melhor forma, mas não consigo achar o outro. É no mínimo curioso.
Apesar da probabilidade de vc já ter escrito sobre isso, fica a dica, ainda assim.

Oi Philipe! Parabéns pelo no layout. Aqui no meu PC ficou mais leve.

Cara, eu sou um cara que quer acreditar. Só que, é difícil. Veja, não digo que não exista vida fora da Terra, pois na imensidão que é este universo, certamente deve ter. Se ela é inteligente, vá lá, deve ter e deve ser muito mais inteligente que a gente. Isso eu aceito.

Agora, à luz de cada relato bizarro que eu leio, fica cada vez mais difícil acreditar.

Um dos sites que costumo dar uma olhada é esse aqui:
http://badufos.blogspot.com.br/
Sim, o cara é um cético, mas sempre trás bastante informações interessantes ainda que sejam comprometidas pelo seu ponto de vista. Recentemente, ele fez um relato sobre o congresso internacional de ufologia de 2014. É muito interessante e acho que devias dar uma olhada. Se possível uma matéria bala tb! ;)

Quanto ao Clube de Nacional de Imprensa. Se não me engano aconteceu também no ano passado. O que me deixa um pouco com o pé atrás é, que apesar dos depoimentos virem de pessoas que, em princípio, são “de confiança”, infelizmente, se limtam a relatos. Relatos que são influenciados pelo que elas viram e foram capazes de julgar como inexplicável ou, como diria o Tsoukalos em qualquer situação, “aliens”. Só que não há fotos, vídeos, nada. Não há fonte oficial, nunca. Eu entendo que, segundo a regra número 1 da teoria da conspiração, o governo sempre está, estará ou esteve enganando as pessoas.

O que mais me intrigou em termos de UFO nos últimos tempos foi oobejto que entra e sai no vulcão mexicano. Alguém já conseguiu desmentir ou expicar aquilo? Eu não encontrei nenhuma explicação plausível.

Espero que continue com mais matérias sobre ufologia. Recomendo também o:
http://www.anonymousfo.com/
Sempre têm uns vídeos legais e, eventualmente, aparece alguma coisa bem intrigante e de difícil explicação.

Abração!

Parece que os “hominhos verdes”, estão realmente interessados em interferir nas atitudes egoistas e inconsequentes dos humanos imbecis que acham que pode tudo!

Grande Philipe!
Acompanhando suas matérias, da pra ver que 1) a humanidade está a ponto de fazer uma m**** muito grande e 2) alguém de fora não quer que façamos tal m****. Alienígenas ou não, bem intencionados ou não, tudo mostra que eles estão lá…

Somente um comentário linguístico: “misseis ICBMs” seria um pleonasmo, pois ICBM = InterContinental Ballistic Missile

Quanto ao video, somente analisando o video original para determinar a veracidade da informação.
Sobre relatos de ovnis, nestes ultimos anos a Inglaterra, Brasil e França começaram a publicar relatos militares e de civis, de acontecimentos e fatos ocorridos onde nao foi possivel explicar que tipo de objeto voador efetuava um evento. Por exemplo, aqui no Brasil no Arquivo Nacional, ha varios documentos fornecidos pela Aeronaltica Brasileira, que podem ser analisados por qualquer um. Ja li varios documentos e em alguns casos, penso que pode ser havido algum caso real de Ovni.
Também em um site ingles é possivel ver e analisar os relatos ocorridos na Inglaterra, depois se eu tiver o link publico aqui, mas parece que tem que pagar pra ver…hehehe
Pra mim, se um relato de ovni é publicado por autoridade militar, desde que nao seja um caso de desinformação, eu posso acreditar que algo possa a existir em relação a Ovni.
Agora acreditar em videos publicados por qualquer um no youtube ou outro meio, fico com um pé atras, porque publicam com intenção de aparecer….

Adorei o post! E clamo para q os Ets façam algo também a respeito do PT no governo brasileiro!

Parece a barra do breakout! Acho que são patos voando em formação, mas a compressão de imagens faz parecer uma linha reta. Quando a ” barra” diminui e acelera um pouco é a formação de patos virando e vindo em direção do observador.
Resumindo: duas ilusões de óticas, sendo uma natural e outra tecnológica (da câmera).

porque so usam tekpix,ta pra o cabra macho que vai usar uma GoPro HERO3+ou canon sd60

É porque o costume de quando você filma algo estranho no céu é dar zoom. Quanto mais zoom você dá, menor a qualidade e pior a precisão da mira que você dispara contra o que está avistando.

Existe uma teoria defendida pelos ufólogos de que as aparições e os contatos com extraterrestres tornaram-se mais comuns depois de que adentramos a era nuclear, ou seja, depois de 1945. Há vários relatos de que o deserto de Nevada, onde eram feitos os testes nucleares americanos antes de lançarem as bombas no Japão, eram visitados freqüentemente por naves estranhas. O que os ufólogos dizem é que os ETs bonzinhos estão aí para serem os guardiões da nossa espécie e evitar uma extinção em massa devido à burrice de uma guerra atômica. Há outra corrente que defende que explosões de artefatos atômicos poderiam desencadear abalos sísmicos e outros acidentes naturais que viriam a interferir no campo magnético da terra – verdadeiro alvo dos ETs. Há estudiosos que defendem uma teoria de que os ETs alimentam suas naves com combustível eletromagnético retirado de vulcões e outros eventos sísmicos. Se é verdade ou não… Mas o fato é que no terremoto que sacudiu Los Angeles ontem de manhã havia uma luz intensa pairando sobre uma parte da cidade e do mar e o evento foi filmado. O mesmo ocorreu no Canadá, onde os tremores também foram sentidos e na costa Chilena, no Domingo, durante um terremoto que deixou a população praiana assustada. São sempre luzes que aparecem e desaparecem com grande intensidade, tal como ocorreu na queda do meteorito na Rússia.

Esses Ets são sinistros, transformam qualquer câmera full hd em tekpix… kkkkk…
Eu penso que essas aparições são muito mais terrenas do que alinígenas…
Caso essa imagem não seja uma fralde, em meio a tantas que surgem todos os dias na internet, creio que esses objetos sejam aviões não tripulados de monitoramento… americano, talvez…

I recently noted the above commentary regarding UFO interference with ICBM sites at Malmstrom AFB in March 1967, and decided to correct a few misconceptions that the authors of the associated bits – in tandem with Robert Salas and Robert Hastings – seem to be so obsessed with. This apparently stems, for the most part, from their refusal to accept the claims of the only two people who were actually present at Echo Flight: Eric D. Carlson, the commander of Echo Flight, and Walt Figel, his deputy commander. Both men have repeatedly asserted that UFOs were not involved with those events in 1967. You are welcome to believe whatever you like, but Robert Salas, author of “Faded Giant”, and Robert Hastings, author of “UFOs and Nukes” have been repeatedly accused of lying about and/or embellishing details of these incidents by those military veterans who served their nation well during the hottest period of the Vietnam War and the coldest stretch of the Cold War. The fact that there is not even one single condition of evidence to prove the claims these men have addressed is a point that very few of you have shown any willingness to consider.

If you wish to know exactly what happened in 1967, and why the missiles at Echo Flight actually failed, and why the Oscar Flight claims are so pointlessly irresponsible, I encourage you to examine (without any cost, a deal Hastings and Salas have been unwilling to match) the following narratives:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26641522/Americans-Credulous-by-James-Carlson

http://www.scribd.com/doc/42303580/Echo-Flights-of-Fantasy-Anatomy-of-a-UFO-Hoax-by-James-Carlson [this one is an examination of the issues for those unfamiliar with the case]

http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2011/08/strategic-editing/

http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2012/04/how-to-demand-redress-by-shooting-yourself-in-the-foot/

http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2012/10/the-aggressive-pursuit-of-ignorance/

I would also recommend that you examine the numerous interviews and articles at the Reality Uncovered website: http://www.realityuncovered.net/. Many of the articles discuss the events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967, and include interviews with both the commander and the deputy commander at Echo Flight on March 16, 1967. To this day, Robert Salas insists that both men confirm his claims of UFO interference, which both men deny strongly. Robert Hastings refuses entirely to discuss these matters in detail or to answer any questions regarding the testimonies of these two men, preferring instead to attack the integrity and credibility of those publically raising such issues. He refuses to offer anything substantial in the way of evidence, and fails entirely to explain the details of his claims or to answer any of the valid questions raised by his insistence. What he has done is rely on the craven use of blatant lies and baseless insults in regard to his critics without once managing to refute or even discuss their criticisms. Even worse, he has neglected to defend his own theories against numerous accusations of massive fraud and profiteering on a scale UFO proponent communities have only rarely been subjected to.

A lot information regarding these alleged “UFO” incidents can be found at the Reality Uncovered forum, in particular the Echo Flight Incident thread at http://www.realityuncovered.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1688. Every single detail, digression, discussion or subject of argument asserted by both of these dishonest and irresponsible men has been explained and discussed in great detail in the documents and on the websites you’ve been directed to. Not one question has been left unanswered, a statement that neither Hastings nor Salas can honestly affirm. Both men, in fact, are proven liars who have created fiction and called it fact, something anyone willing to actually do the research can determine very readily for himself, as the events they’ve wrapped their pathetic clams around – contrary to their prior assertions – have been completely declassified since before 1980.

Tim Hebert, an ex-USAF missileer himself, has also written some very enlightening articles regarding the Echo Flight case on his blog at http://timhebert2.blogspot.com/. You should probably take the time to read them, as the information they contain are important to those wanting to know the truth. He has written an especially enlightening series of articles on Robert Salas’ claims in regard to Oscar Flight that can be read at http://timhebert3.blogspot.com/. The fact that he is an ex-missileer himself gives his work an authority that those without such a background should take seriously. He has served his nation with far more responsibility than that mustered by Robert Salas, and he did so for longer than the USAF required for the education he received, an insistent point of fact that Salas is unable to equal, since he left the Air Force for a civilian career as soon as he met the lowest standards of his expected duty. While there is no moral assessment implied in this discussion, it is nonetheless hard not to recognize and compare the value that each man has placed on their duty. Robert Salas left the USAF as soon as he could legally do so, took his education and began a new career, while Tim Hebert continued to serve his nation, and learned much more in regard to those same missile systems that Salas has attempted to portray himself as having some expertise with. In addition, the fact remains that Robert salas failed to mention “UFO” is association with ANYTHING that may or may not have occurred at Malmstrom AFB for 30-years, and did so only after two very important asociated events took place: the complete declassification of the Echo Flight incident, and the attempts of an ignorant few to link that incident with a UFO sighting, report and investigation that never occurred. The fact that Salas has been unable to name even a single eye-witness to the UFO he has invented from nothing seems to have escaped the notice of those exhibiting the will to believe such incandescent crap.

Dr. David Clarke, for many years an accepted expert regarding the British military forces’ investigations of the UFO phenomenon, has also discussed the Echo Flight case in the context of the “UFO and Nukes” connection asserted by Robert Hastings and Robert Salas. You can and should read his article on the subject at http://drdavidclarke.blogspot.com/2010/11/flat-earth-nukes.html.

The folk tales currently being spread by Hastings and Salas like so much infectious manure have not merely been dismissed as one possible interpretation of their claims; they have been repeatedly dismantled and shredded – proven as lies by witness testimony and documented evidence that many UFO proponents wish to ignore, since they continue to show themselves incapable of otherwise explaining in the context of a real flying saucer. There is no doubt whatsoever that Salas with the assistance of Hastings has created this UFO case outright. There were no actual UFOs involved – it is a lie and nothing more. Witnesses that both men have presented to the public have actually come forward to dispute the claims these men have made. They insist that their statements were taken out of context and distorted purposely in order to suggest the presence of UFOs where no such presence could otherwise be established. Salas and Hastings have perpetrated a UFO hoax of the worst sort, and have attempted to destroy the reputations and career service of better men than themselves.

The commander of Echo Flight on March 16, 1967, CAPT (Ret.) Eric D. Carlson, has released the following very definitive statement:

“Let me start by stating that, as best as I can recall, my only contact with Salas and Hastings has been on the phone. I did tell Salas that he could release my name to whomever he wished, don’t know why he needed my permission. I have talked to a newspaper writer in Great Falls, several years age, and a TV producer from one of those UFO shows. With both these individuals I denied any knowledge of any UFO’s at Malmstrom. In addition, I stated that there was no, repeat no, incident at Oscar flight as Salas maintains. The man is either lying or delusional.

“My only contact with Hastings was a call I received from him regarding his book. I stated that his book sounded interesting and he later sent me a copy which I read and gave away …. At no time did I mention anyone’s mental status; yours, mine, his, or Salas’, although in retrospect I could comment on Salas’.

“My memory is quite good regarding the events at Malmstrom and there is no doubt in my mind that there were no reports of UFO’s and no incident at Oscar flight. I will be willing to discuss this with anyone who is truly interested in the facts.”

His deputy commander at Echo Flight, COL (Ret.) Walter Figel, Jr., has insisted as well that UFOs were not involved, and adds that his version of this event has been distorted by both Robert Salas and Robert Hastings in order to give the impression that an actual UFO was involved. He asserts very strongly that no UFOs were involved, nor were UFOs ever reported. Regarding the comments made in the past by Robert Hastings regarding Figel’s impression of me or of the acts I have undertaken, COL Figel has never, throughout the years I’ve known him, accused me of lying, and has, in fact, been refreshingly open and definitive in regard to the events of March 1967, and has repeatedly confirmed all of the aspects of this story that I have published or otherwise made available and that my father, Eric D. Carlson, has repeatedly confirmed. No other assessment of my relationship with Figel or my father is necessary or has any bearing on the facts the three of us have publically addressed.

Walt Figel has released numerous comments regarding the incidents of March 1967, including the following very definitive statement addressed to me:

“James,

“First – your dad has not lied about anything nor do believe that he is even capable of lying about anything at all. He was, is, and always will be an honorable man. You should remember that always – I will.

“Second – Bob Salas was never associated with any shutdown of any missiles at any time in any flight and you can take that to the bank. Just think about this for a split second. He is a person wrapped up in UFOs to the Nth degree. Yet he could not remember he was not at Echo. Then he thought he was at November – wrong again. Then he thought he was at Oscar – wrong again.

“Third – There is no record about anything happening at November or Oscar except in people’s minds that are flawed beyond imagination. Salas has created events out of the thin air and can’t get the facts straight even then. My best friend to this day was the flight commander of the 10th SMS at the time. He and I have discussed this silly assertion in the past couple of years – he thinks it is all madeup nonsense for sure. I put both Salas and Hastings in touch with him and he has told them both that an incident at November or Oscar never happened. In addition he was subsequently stationed at Norton AFB where the engineers tested the possible problems. No little green men were responsible.

“Fourth – I have always maintained that I do not nor have I ever believed that UFOs exist in any form at any place at any time. I have never seen one or reported that I have seen one. I have always maintained that they had nothing to do with the shutdown of Echo flight in Montana.

“Fifth – The event at Malmstrom has a hand written log from me that was turned in just like all the other logs that I wrote over several years. I would think that if I wrote something like that in the log, there would be copies, it would have been classified at the beginning and then released along with the classified SAC messages and base reports. Nothing in that urgent SAC message even hints of UFOs at all and I think that it would if the official logs or telephone calls had referenced that fact.

“Sixth – When it happened, neither your dad nor I were “visibly shaken” by the events. It was just another day with a unexpected event in our lives. It was rather underwhelming at the time. No one rushed out to see us, no one made us sign any papers, no one interrogated us for hours on end.

“There is no Air Force “cover-up” [of the events of March 1967]; it just did not happen the way Salas and [sic] has portrayed the course of events. I am sorry that you are all caught up in a pissing contest with these people, I really am. They are just not going to let go no matter what you say or do. He has made a 15 year career pandering about the country talking about things he has no knowledge about. I am not at all interested in taking them on – it’s not worth my effort – I have more important things to do with my life. I much rather just stay out of it.

“Hopefully, we can move on. I did read about a briefing on the 27th here in DC. I am here in VA about 10 miles away. Interesting. Hopefully this helps you and confirms to you at least that your dad is a straight shooter and does not lie to anyone.”

Robert Salas’ commander at Oscar Flight, Frederick Meiwald, insists that he doesn’t even believe in UFOs – a strange comment to make in light of Salas’ insistence that a UFO took out the missiles at Oscar Flight during an incident that resulted in an injury to one non-commissioned officer, requiring that man to be evacuated from the site by helicopter. When interviewed by Robert Hastings, he stated unequivocally that he doesn’t remember anything at all about a UFO. In fact, Robert Hastings himself has written:

“Meiwald then elaborated and said that he couldn’t support everything Salas has said about the incident because he had been resting/sleeping when the first missile or two dropped offline — which occurred moments after Salas received a report from the Oscar Flight Security Controller about a UFO hovering over the Launch Control Facility’s front gate.

“Although Salas had quickly told Meiwald about that telephone conversation, Meiwald says that he can’t remember it.”

In another interview conducted by Hastings, Meiwald is equally clear (RH is Robert Hastings and FM is Frederick Meiwald):

“RH: Okay. Now, when Bob, I think moments [after] he woke you up, or you got up and sat down at the commander’s console — he of course had received a call from the Flight Security Controller, saying that there was a bright red, oval-shaped object hovering over the security fence gate — my understanding is that is what he told you as soon as you were at your console, that he had received this call and, uh, that of course coincided with the missiles beginning to malfunction. Do you recall him telling you that?

“FM: I really don’t remember that portion of it, relative to the bright object. I remember an unusual condition [but] as far as the details, uh, I can’t elaborate on that.”

The following exchange is also revealing:

“RH: Okay. He of course has also said that you two were, uh, when you were back at Malmstrom, you were debriefed by OSI and required to sign non-disclosure statements. Do you remember that?

“FM: I remember being directed to do that. But that was no problem. I’ve been one of these people, when told to forget something, I forget it—eventually [inaudible].

“RH: Right, well, is that a polite way of saying that you really don’t want to discuss this, even though you know more than you’re saying?

“FM: No, I’m saying I don’t remember.”

For nearly ten years Salas was using Meiwald as confirmation of the events at both November Flight and Oscar Flight, stating that either my father or someone else called Meiwald on March 16 and told him all about Echo Flight. When interviewed by Hastings, Meiwald stated, “Whatever happened over at Echo, I have no idea.” He has rebuffed completely the attempts by Hastings and Salas to establish confirmation for the UFOs they’ve invented, and yet both men continue to insist that he has confirmed every aspect of Salas’ ridiculous UFO claims.

Meiwald has also clearly stated in other interviews with Salas that only 3-4 missiles failed during the one missile failures event he has recalled; he’s NEVER stated outright that the UFO story he told Salas in 1996 had anything at all to do with missile failures; it’s never even been mentioned in context. The plain fact is that Frederick Meiwald has NEVER associated the one instant of missile failures he recalls with a UFO. This association is a complete invention asserted by Robert Salas, one that Meiwald has never even hinted at.

My father, the commander of Echo Flight in March 1967, was present when all ten missiles were taken off of strategic alert by an electronic noise pulse generated internally at the launch control facility at Echo Flight. This pulse interfered with the normal operation of the logic coupler on the guidance and control module for that facility, causing thereby the failure of the missiles, which were, in effect, simply turned off. The incident was very well documented and was thoroughly investigated, and every word that Robert Salas and Robert Hastings have ever said on the subject has been repeatedly discounted or proven outright to be little more than lies and embellishments created for the purpose of making money from the sales of their books, the sales of associated videos, and the speaking fees they charge as a matter of course when retelling their ridiculous little folk tales.

I’m not asking you to believe these points I’ve outlined. It isn’t necessary, as they’re already included in the public record and can be examined by anyone who’s interested in the subject. I do ask, however, that you give some further thought to the silly little claims you’ve discussed for your own benefit and for the protection of your reputation. You should be aware that there is another point of view in regard to these matters – one that has been repeatedly confirmed by those men who were actually involved with this singular event in USAF history, has been very well-documented through the years, and was very thoroughly investigated by the USAF for some months after the incident itself. It is due to this that any continued support for the claims these frauds have made will eventually be considered little more than the very poor judgment of a few very confused and ignorant men. It is entirely up to you whether you are to be included in that assessment. Your ignorance of such issues will have no bearing whatsoever on the eventual consideration of your own reputation; only your perceived support of these ill-considered claims will have any effect.

There were only two witnesses at Echo Flight in March 1967: the commander of the flight, CAPT Eric D. Carlson, and the deputy commander, COL Walter Figel, Jr. Both men have publically affirmed that there was no UFO. Robert Hastings is merely an agitator – a liar and a fraud who has repeatedly misrepresented the claims of the men involved in these incidents. He started utilizing this methodology years ago, found out it was convincing to a few ignorant people, and continues his path of slander and disruption as a result of past minor successes. He’s just a petty con-man and a fraudulent huckster – nothing more. Robert Salas is a proven liar and a fraud, a man who conceived of this strategy in concert with James Klotz and Dale Goudie in order to convince actual USAF witnesses to come forward and assert their own claims. This strategy has proven to be a failure, although it has provided Salas with a second career to foster, which makes it an intolerable insult aside from the obvious insults he has already committed against my family.

Together, Hastings and Salas represent the very worst aspects of American UFOlogy. It is they and men like them who have proven to be the primary source of the stench normal humans – including those necessary to enable any well funded investigation of UFO phenomena – tend to associate with the issues UFO proponents tend to support. In other words, if you truly want to persuade others to appreciate what you value sufficient to support your goals, you are going to have to show some measure of good judgment. When you give the impression of support for an obvious fraud, whether or not that support actually exists, you are presenting an impression that is injurious to your ultimate goals. In any case, do as you will. It is advisable, however, to take into account what others have already proven.

Most sincerely,
James Carlson
Albuquerque, NM?

Caso seja veridica a imagem e seja um ovni e nao um droni, penso em duas coisas:
1)Será que as forças armadas americanas, por exemplo, nao afirmam nada sobre a existencia de ovnis porque as armas que possuem contra os alienigenas sao inuteis em caso de uma batalha e isso poderia deixar a população desesperada com a noticia?
2)Será que os alienigenas possuem algum receptor sensivel de radiação e localizam facilmente os locais que possuam armas atomicas? Ou será que alem da radiação normal Alfa/Beta ou Gama, é emitido algo amais que não conseguimos identificar, mas os alienigenas sim? Ou farejam nossas comunicações e localizam o local das armas radioativas?
Bom vai ser dificil eu ter as respostas, só se um alienigena me contar…heheheh

Eu acredito no fenômeno OVNI, mas não acredito nesse vídeo.

1) Não há absolutamente nada que prove que ele foi gravado na Ucrânia.
2) A própria descrição do vídeo indica que ele é de propriedade da Audiocolorworld.com, que em seu site diz ser uma produtora de vídeo.
3) O proprietário declarado dessa Audio Color World é um senhor chamado Nico Kaschuba, que é alemão (nem russo, nem ucraniano).
4) O próprio site dessa produtora de vídeo é hospedado na Alemanha.

Isso é puro viral, sem tirar nem por!

Tempo perdido.

“simultaneamente e inexplicavelmente” – Para evitar repetições desagradáveis, use a maneira correta, “simultânea e inexplicavelmente”.

Acho que o problema não é acreditar ou não em OVNIs. Eu já vi objetos no céu que não pude identificar. Que é o que muitos são mesmo. O problema é cair na paranoia coletiva de alienígenas entre nós, sabotando mísseis, abduzindo vacas, fazendo desenhos em plantação. Qual é, né? Por favor, isso já cansou. Parece mais a vinda do Messias, todo mundo bradando – alguns até violentamente – dizendo que acredita em aliens, coisa e tal e xingando quem não acredita nessas coisas.

Philipe, vc ja pensou na possibilidade de esses ufos serem viajantes do futuro? tipo isso explicaria coisas como eles não fazerem contato direto, para não causar uma instabilidade nos acontecimentos da historia. Tipo, eu pensei que eles poderiam estar nos visitando para colher informações, que possam ter se perdido depois de um evento apocaliptico.

é um ideia

Muitos devem se lembrar dos fo fighters, antigas bolas de luz voadoras que os pilotos da segunda guerra viam nos céus durante os combates. Pra muitos tudo isso pode parecer loucura, mas esses importantes depoimentos demonstram que algo ou alguém muito superior a raça humana tecnologicamente e moralmente sempre se preocupou com o destino da humanidade. Da mesma forma preocuparíamos se víssemos animais inferiores se auto aniquilando sem um motivo natural. Ou seja, sem naturalidade instintiva.

INTERVENÇÃO

É o ufo mais conhecido como DRONE AMERICANO.

Os EUA, Russia, etc. sabem que uma força maior que a deles, monitoram este planeta a mando de mais Alto, isso é mais certo que 2 e 2 são 4. Mas a arrogãncia destes governantes é tamanha que eles não dão o braço a torcer e continuam negando sempre para o povo, tratando o povão como idiotas, carneirinhos que precisam ser protegidos dos agressivos alienigenas, quando, todos sabemos que os agressivos são nossos governantes que imaginam que são os donos deste planeta! pobres mortais, são germes e imaginam que são deuses!!!!!

kkkkkkkkkkkkk